Join the Community
[Login / Register]


HorrorBid Is Almost The New - We Need Your Feedback - Info!!
Greetings everyone! We have been talking about it for a good while now, and the time is ne…
Jason Voorhees Returns In JASON XMAS! See The First 2 Parts Right Here!
If you are craving something new from the world of Jason Voorhees then you have come to th…
Inspired By True Events Comes HOUSE OF DUST - See The Trailer Here!
Redding House Asylum. For some, it is a reminder of a different time when medical treatmen…
Trailer For Eli Roth's THE GREEN INFERNO Finally Arrives!
Try and imagine being part a group of college friends who are all are protesting for a na…

2 Evil Dead 4's Are In The Works? Sam Raimi Sues Over The Rights For An Evil Dead Sequel

    Bookmark and Share

All breaking horror news and rumors for the month of May, 2012

2 Evil Dead 4's Are In The Works? Sam Raimi Sues Over The Rights For An Evil Dead Sequel

New postby Brian Massey » Fri May 04, 2012 7:07 pm

In a strange turn of events we just learned from The Hollywood Reporter that a fight has broken out over who has rights to do a new sequel of the 1980s horror classic The Evil Dead.

Who will prevail? Will it be Renaissance Pictures, which was formed in 1979 by producer-director Sam Raimi, producer Robert Tapert and actor-producer Bruce Campbell for the sole purpose of making the first film, or will it be Award Pictures, which says it plans to make a fourth film in the series? Read on for all the details...


This whole ordeal started when Award Pictures announced that they were planning on resurrecting the Evil Dead franchise which hasn't saw a new film since 1992's Army of Darkness. Allegedly Raimi now has intentions of his own to bring forth another sequel which will be produced by Sony Pictures and FilmDistrict and he feels that Arrow is interfering with his plans.

For their defense, Award Pictures is using a comment that was made in a 2000 book in which Raimi stated that he would never do a sequel as proof that the "Evil Dead" trademark was abandoned by the producer-director. As a result he company now believe that it is the new primary trademark holder of the film title.

The lawsuit should teach a valuable lesson to all those in Hollywood who attempt to lower expectations among fans and the media for a sequel to a cult hit.

Renaissance says in its lawsuit that fans "have long been eager for another installment," and Raimi finally announced last year he would co-write and co-produce a remake of the original. Shortly before the announcement, Renaissance went to the U.S. Trademark Office to register the mark.

One unforeseeable problem occurred - Award Pictures filed an objection, claiming they were also preparing for their own Evil Dead film. The company stated that Renaissance's hold on "Evil Dead" was abandoned and thus, Award Pictures should be deemed as being a prior user.
In an effort to show this "abandonment," Award Pictures pointed to the comments attributed to Tapert and Raimi in the 2000 book, The Evil Dead Companion: "Ha," said Rob and Sam. "We're never going to do a sequel."
"This statement is a public declaration by the defendant that the defendant abandoned the alleged 'mark,' Evil Dead, decades ago," says Award Pictures in papers to the USPTO's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

Award Pictures then goes on to say that even if Evil Dead was a valid mark upon the release of the first film, the sequels can't be counted as continued use because they were both "works for hire" and "single works." Additionally, the company points to 20 other motion pictures that have used Evil Dead within their title over the years, saying that Renaissance has exhibited "uncontrolled, unregulated and undefended use of Evil Dead." Finally, Award says Renaissance's purported trademark claims constitute a defrauding of others in the entertainment industry.

As a result, Renaissance has decided to strike back this week by issuing a lawsuit against Award Pictures, saying it indeed has used its mark, for example licensing Evil Dead video games, dolls, clothing, memorabilia, comic books, etc.
According to the lawsuit, "As a result of Renaissance's use of the Evil Dead mark and the cult success of the films and related products, the Evil Dead mark has acquired enormous value, has become famous among the relevant consuming public and motion picture trade and is recognized as identifying and distinguishing Renaissance exclusively and uniquely as the source of goods sold and services provided under the Evil Dead mark."

Renaissance claims that Award Pictures' planned film entitled Evil Dead 4: Consequences, is intended to cause confusion to consumers and that the key plot elements and character names "would inevitably infringe Renaissance's copyright rights in The Evil Dead." Alleging trademark infringement, false advertising and injury to business reputation, Renaissance is asking for an injunction against further infringement and further monetary damages.

So the moral to this whole story is this -- If you're a director or a producer in Hollywood, then you should be more careful about what you say, especially if it's going to be published.

Please let us know your thoughts on this whole drama which is unfolding even as your reading this. I would personally rather see a fourth film from Raimi and company.

Brian Massey
HorrorBid is a "fan drivin" horror site which includes articles that are written by you the fans. Because of this some stories may have incorrect sourcing or other issues. If you have any concern about a post, please contact us by clicking here.

Re: 2 Evil Dead 4's Are In The Works? Sam Raimi Sues Over The Rights For An Evil Dead Sequ

New postby weaponx » Fri May 04, 2012 10:30 pm

This is just ridiculous. Award Pictures are going to get destroyed in court.
User avatar
Posts: 175
Headlines: 1
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:28 pm
Location: Collegeville, PA
Real Name: James
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Relationship: Engaged
Favorite Sub-Genre: Horror-Comedy

Re: 2 Evil Dead 4's Are In The Works? Sam Raimi Sues Over The Rights For An Evil Dead Sequ

New postby Zer0.MediA » Sun May 06, 2012 4:34 am

I don't understand how any lawyer can see all the merch that's been created over the years and still think they have a case by calling the license "abandoned". Am I to believe that if a writer/director claims he's never going to make a sequel to something, that I can make my own sequel and call it my own property?

If that's the case, we should all get together and shoot Clerks 3: Hardly Clerkin'.
User avatar
New User:
New User:
Posts: 24
Headlines: 0
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:07 am
Real Name: Steven
Gender: Male
Favorite Sub-Genre: Zombie

Return to May/2012

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests